Population (P) Edentulous patients who underwent surgical implant placement using stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide method.
Intervention (I) Implant placement with stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide
Comparator or control group (C) Comparison of planned implant position with actual implant position after surgical implant placement
Outcomes (O) Deviation (distance in mm) between virtual planning and actual implant surgical placement according to global apical, global coronal, and angulation position
Focus questions Does stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide ensure accurate enough implant placement?
What factors could affect the accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide?