No | Item | Yes | No | Unable to
determine |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Is the hypothesis/aim/objective of study clearly stated? | 72 (87.8) | 10 (12.2) | 0 |
2 | Is the design of the study described? | 55 (67.1) | 27 (32.9) | 0 |
3 | Is the design appropriate to the stated objectives? | 52 (63.4) | 0 | 30 (36.6) |
4 | Is the sample size stated and justified? | 0 | 82 (100) | 0 |
5 | Is the setting/location of the study described? | 61 (74.4) | 21 (25.6) | 0 |
6 | Are the eligibility criteria, and sources and methods of selection of participants described? | 59 (72.0) | 23 (28.0) | 0 |
7 | Are the main outcomes to be measured clearly described in the introduction or methods section? | 71 (86.6) | 8 (9.8) | 3 (3.7) |
8 | Are the subjects asked to participate in the study representative of the entire population from which they were recruited? | 15 (18.3) | 5 (6.1) | 62 (75.6) |
9 | Are any efforts to address potential sources of bias described? | 13 (15.9) | 69 (84.1) | 0 |
10 | Is the participation rate stated? | 46 (56.1) | 29 (35.4) | 7 (8.5) |
11 | Is the follow up rate stated? (if applicable) | 20 (69.0) | 4 (13.8) | 5 (17.2) |
12 | Are the statistical methods described? | 71 (86.6) | 11 (13.4) | 0 |
13 | Are the main findings of the study clearly described? | 68 (82.9) | 9 (11.0) | 5 (6.1) |
14 | Were the main outcomes measured used accurate (valid and reliable)? | 59 (72.0) | 1 (1.2) | 22 (26.8) |
15 | Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results? | 32 (39.0) | 45 (54.9) | 5 (6.1) |
16 | Discuss limitations of the study taking into account sources of potential bias or imprecision? | 48 (58.5) | 33 (40.2) | 1 (1.2) |