Table 1. | Quality analysis of reviewed articles |
| Study |
Year of publication |
Sample size |
Case selection quality |
Validity of methodology |
Statistical analysis adequacy |
Confounding variables adequately addressed |
Results reporting |
Judged quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ritz et al. [12] | 2002 | + | - | + | + | + | + | High |
| Chung et al. [17] | 2012 | - | + | - | + | - | - | Low |
| Dolk et al. [18] | 2010 | + | + | + | + | - | + | High |
| Gilboa et al. [19] | 2005 | + | + | + | + | + | + | High |
| Hansen et al. [20] | 2009 | - | - | + | + | - | + | Medium |
| Hwang et al. [21] | 2008 | + | - | + | + | + | + | High |
| Marshall et al. [22] | 2010 | + | + | + | + | - | + | High |
| Rankin et al. [23] | 2009 | - | + | + | + | + | + | High |
.png)
.png)
.png)