Table 1. | Description of the included papers |
| Author | Year of publication | Baseline records | Clinical parameters | Radiographic evaluation | Peri-implantitis/implant success | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | PD | BOP | SUPP/exudate | Mobility | Other clinical indices | |||||
| Koldsland et al. [3] | 2010 |
Different levels of severity: > 4 mm; ≥ 6 mm. |
+ | + | Digital orthopantomograms and full-mouth status intraoral analogue pictures used; different levels of peri-implantitis severity: bone loss ≥ 2 mm; and ≥ 3 mm |
Peri-implantitis defined as detectible peri-implant bone loss with inflammation. Levels of severity: 1. bone loss ≥ 2 mm + BOP/SUPP at PD ≥ 4 or ≥ 6 mm; 2. bone loss ≥ 3 mm and BOP/SUPP at PD ≥ 4 mm or PD ≥ 6 mm. |
||||
|
Misch et al. [18] International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference |
2008 | Bone-loss measurements should be related to the original marginal bone level at implant insertion. | + |
+ May be of little diagnostic value; routine probing depths are not suggested in the absence of other signs or symptoms. |
+ | + | Conventional periapical radiographs; computer-assisted images and customized X-ray positioning devices may be superior. | Success; Satisfactory; Compromised (peri-implantitis); Compromised. |
||
| Success | No pain | No history of exudate | No mobility | < 2 mm | ||||||
| Satisfactory | No pain | No history of exudate | No mobility | 2 to 4 mm | ||||||
| Compromised = slight to moderate peri-implantitis | May be sensitive | PD > 7 | May have exudate history | No mobility | > 4 mm, < 1/2 implant body | |||||
| Failure | Pain | Exudate | Mobility | > 1/2 length of implant | ||||||
|
Lindhe and Meyle [19] Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology |
2008 | Baseline probing measurements and radiographs should be recorded at the time of suprastructure placement. At minimum, annual monitoring of the peri-implant probing depths and the presence of BOP and SUPP must be performed. |
+ Probing at four surfaces is essential for diagnosis of peri-implantitis. |
+ BOP indicates the presence of inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa. |
+ Suppuration is a sign of peri-implantitis. |
+ | When clinical signs suggest the presence of peri-implantitis, the clinician is advised to take a radiograph. |
Peri-implant mucositis: can be identified clinically by redness and swelling of the soft tissue, but bleeding on probing is currently recognized as the important feature.
Peri-implantitis: a mucosal lesion is often associated with suppuration and deepened pockets but always accompanied by loss of supporting marginal bone. |
||
|
Lang and Berghlundh [20] Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology |
2011 | Time of prosthesis installation should be chosen to establish baseline radiographs and peri-implant probing. This will be the reference from which the development of peri-implant disease can be recognized and followed in subsequent examinations. | + | + | + | When changes in clinical parameters indicate disease (BOP, increased PD), the clinician is encouraged to take a radiograph to evaluate possible bone loss (PD > 5 mm + BOP, take a radiograph) | Peri-implantitis: changes in the level of crestal bone, presence of bleeding on probing and/or suppuration; with or without concomitant deepening of peri-implant pockets. Puss is a common finding at peri-implantitis sites. | |||
| Froum et al. [21] | 2012 | Obtain a periapical radiograph immediately following placement of the definite prosthesis. | + | + | + | + | Early peri-implantitis; Moderate peri-implantitis; Advanced peri-implantitis. |
|||
| Early peri-implantitis | PD ≥ 4 mm | BOP | +/- SUPP noted on two or more aspects of the implant | < 25% of the implant length | ||||||
| Moderate | PD ≥ 6 mm | BOP | +/- SUPP noted on two or more aspects of the implant | 25 - 50% of the implant length | ||||||
| Advanced | PD ≥ 8 mm | BOP | +/- SUPP noted on two or more aspects of the implant | > 50% of the implant length | ||||||
| Kadkhodazadeh et al. [22] | 2012 | Implant success index | Not reported |
+ PD ≤ 4 mm; PD > 4 mm |
+ | Is neither representative of a specific condition nor a predictable factor for further tissue breakdown | + |
Long cone, parallel peri-apical technique; ≤ 2 mm (≤ 20%) - initiation of hard-tissue breakdown; 2 to 4 mm (< 40%) - hard-tissue breakdown > 40 % - severe bone loss |
Implant success index: I. Clinically healthy: PD ≤ 4mm; BOP –. II. Soft-tissue inflammation PD ≤ 4 mm; BOP +. III. Deep soft-tissue pockets PD > 4 mm; BOP +. IV. Initiation of hard-tissue breakdown. V. Hard-tissue breakdown plus soft-tissue recession. VI. Notable hard-tissue breakdown. VII. Notable hard-tissue breakdown plus soft-tissue recession. VIII. Severe bone loss. IX. Clinical failure - Mobility. |
|
|
Sanz et al. [23] Eight European Workshop on Periodontology |
2012 | Baseline clinical and radiological data should be established once the remodelling phase post-implant placement has occurred. | Long-cone parallel radiographs; in the absence of previous radiographic records, a threshold vertical distance of 2 mm from the expected marginal bone level following remodelling post-implant placement is recommended, provided peri-implant inflammation is evident. | Peri-implantitis - inflammatory process around the implant that includes both soft-tissue inflammation and progressive bone loss of supporting bone beyond biological bone remodelling. | ||||||
| American Academy of Periodontology [24] | 2013 | Establish clinical and radiographic baseline at final prosthesis insertion. There is no single diagnostic tool that can, with certainty, establish a diagnosis of peri-implantitis. | + | + | + | + | Bacterial culturing, inflammatory markers, and genetics may be useful in the diagnosis. |
Periapical radiographs should be perpendicular to the implant body.
CBCT may be considered depending on the location of progressive attachment loss. |
Used the definition by Sanz et al. [23] | |
| Padial- Molina et al. [25] | 2014 | Baseline records should be used as a reference from which the development of peri-implant disease can be recognized and followed in subsequent examinations. | + Should be repeated over time but not considered an absolute and isolated diagnostic tool. |
+ | + | + |
Conventional radiographs: intraoral and panoramic are reliable; computer assisted are more accurate.
Take a radiograph if PD < 5 mm + BOP/SUPP detected. |
PD ≤ 5 mm + BOP/SUPP / + bone loss ≤ 2 mm = mucositis.
PD > 6 mm + bone loss ≥ 2 mm = peri-implantitis. |
||
| Ata-Ali et al. [26] | 2015 | X-rays must be obtained at implant placement and prosthesis installation to allow comparisons with the periapical X-rays obtained at periodic patient controls. | Peri-implant probing is essential for establishing a diagnosis of peri-implant disease. | + | + | Parallelized intraoral X-rays should be used in all dental implants to determine possible marginal bone loss. |
Stage I: BOP and/or SUPP and bone loss ≤ 3 mm beyond biological bone remodelling.
Stage II: BOP and/or SUPP and bone loss > 3 mm but < 5 mm beyond biological bone remodelling. Stage III: BOP and/or SUPP and bone loss ≥ 5 mm beyond biological bone remodelling. Stage IV: BOP and/or SUPP and bone loss ≥ 50% of the implant length beyond biological bone remodelling. |
|||
+ parameter suggested to be used; BOP = bleeding on probing; PD = probing-pocket depth; SUPP = suppuration. |
.png)