Table 4. | Study's that reported cone-beam computed tomography analysis |
Study | Extraction location | Preservation method |
Difference (initial vs follow-up) |
Control group | Period observation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iasella et al. [21] | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | Group A - EXT |
Alveolar ridge width: Group A: 17.28 (SD 1.2)/15.68 (SD 1.13) vs Group B: 16.91 (SD 1.34)/15.44 (SD 1.33) |
12 patients, 12 sockets |
6 months |
Group B: RP with a mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, 500 to 1,000 μm particle size, and a collagen membrane | |||||
Meloni et al. [45] | Not specified | Socket grafting with deproteinized bovine bone and sealed with epithelial connective tissue graft or porcine collagen matrix |
Horizontal bone volume (with collagen vs control): Level A (1 mm below the most coronal aspect of the bone crest): 8.24/7.7 vs 8.39/7.72. Level B (3 mm below the most coronal aspect of the bone crest) 8.18/7.35 vs 8.53/7.62. Level C (5 mm below the most coronal aspect of the bone crest) 8.21/7.99 vs 8.27/7.96 |
15 patients, 15 sockets |
17 months |
Vertical bone volume (with collagen vs control): Level D 17.28/16.58 vs 16.91/15.44 |
|||||
Barone et al. [48] | Not specified | Group A - EXT |
Group RP: 10.6 (SD 1)/8.1 (SD 1.4) vs Group EXT: 10.8 (SD 0.8)/6.3 (SD 0.8) |
20 patients, 20 sockets |
7 to 9 months |
Group B: preservation procedure with corticocancellous porcine bone (MP3, Osteobiol®) and collagen membrane (Evolution, Osteobiol®) |
EXT = extraction alone; RP = ridge preservation. |