Table 4. | Non-comparative studies assessing lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with autogenous tooth block graft |
| Study | Outcome measures | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOP | Bone defect |
Grafting material no. |
GT (mm) |
GH (weeks) |
NOI |
OP (weeks) |
ISQ | IS (%) | HSPIT | ARW | GARW | GR | PROM | BCT | |||||
|
BA (mm) |
IAA (mm) |
IP (mm) |
IP (mm) |
IP (mm) |
|||||||||||||||
|
BOP (%) |
CAL (%) |
||||||||||||||||||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||||||||||
| Parvini et al. [32] | 15 | Deficient extraction socket | Autogenous tooth root: 14 | 5.1 (1.8) | 26 | 14 | 26 | NR | 100 | 46.2 (38) | 2.8 (0.4) | 6 (4) | 12.3 (3.2) | 10.9 (1.5) | 4.9 (2.3) | 1.4 (1.5) | NR | FTB: 1 | |
| Wang et al. [33] | 19 | Alveolar ridge deficiency | Autogenous tooth root: 36 | NR | 26 | 28 | NR | 78.3 (6.6) | NR | NR | W1: | 2.2 (0.6) | 5.2 (0.9) | 4.7 (0.7) | 2.5 (0.7) | 0.5 (0.5) | Pain (%) | None | |
|
No: 0; mild: 15.8; moderate: 57.9; severe: 26.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| W2: | 3.3 (0.9) | 7.9 (1.7) | 7.4 (1.6) | 4.1 (1.4) | 0.5 (0.4) | ||||||||||||||
| W3: | 4.4 (1.5) | 9.4 (2.3) | 9 (2.4) | 4.6 (2.1) | 0.5 (0.4) | ||||||||||||||
ARW = alveolar ridge width; FTB = fracture of the tooth block graft; GARW = gain in alveolar ridge width; GH = graft healing; HSPIT = health status of the peri-implant tissue; IAA = immediately after augmentation; IP = implant placement; IS = implant survival; ISQ = implant stability quotient; NR = not reported; OP = observation period after functional implant loading; PROM = patient-reported outcome measures; SD = standard deviation, W1 = 0 mm from the alveolar crest; W2 = 3 mm from the alveolar crest; W3 = 6 mm from the alveolar crest. |
.png)
.png)
.png)