Table 2. | The basic information from articles, evaluating osteoporosis influence on implantation success |
| Study | Study type |
Follow-up (period or mean) |
Sample size | Number of implants | Early complications | Late complications | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maxilla | Mandible |
Patients (%) |
Implants (%) |
Years after restauration |
Patients (%) |
Implants (%) |
||||
| Kuchler et al. [14] | Prospective | 9 weeks | 24 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mozzati et al. [15] | Retrospective | 2 - 9 years | 235 | 660 | 607 | Unknown | Unknown | 5 | 6.8 | 1.3 |
| Holahan et al. [16] | Retrospective | 6,1 years |
645 (all) 208 (with BMD-T scores within 3 years) |
2867 (all) 701 (with BMD-T scores within 3 years) |
Unknown | Unknown | 1 |
Bone quality: good 2.7; moderate 4.6; poor 11.6. |
||
| 3 |
Bone quality: good 4.2; moderate 7.1; poor 16.6. |
|||||||||
| 5 |
Bone quality: good 5; moderate 7.5; poor 17.4. |
|||||||||
| 10 |
Bone quality: good 6.7; moderate 8.8; poor 17.4. |
|||||||||
| Shibli et al. [17] | Retrospective | 4 years | 21 | 22 (non-distinguished) | - | - | - | - | - | |
BMD-T = Bone mineral density test. |
.png)
.png)
.png)