Table 4. | Non-comparative studies assessing mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with a tooth-borne distraction appliance |
| Study |
Year of publication |
Number of patients |
Materials and methods | Outcome measures | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMD (mm) |
Evaluation methods |
Follow-up |
Transverse skeletal expansion |
Transverse skeletal relapse |
Dental arch expansion |
Dental arch relapse |
||||||||
| Mean (SD), mm | Mean (SD), mm | Mean (SD), mm | Mean (SD), mm | |||||||||||
| Del Santo et al. [25] | 2000 | 20 | NR |
Dental cast X-ray |
15 months (6 - 31) |
Region | PO - PD | Region | PD - FFU | Region | PO - PD | Region | PO - FFU | NR |
| BG | 0.7 (4.4) | BG | 0.7 (4.7) | ICD | 3.2 (3.3)a | ICD | 2.4 (1.9)b | |||||||
| BAG | 1.2 (4.4) | BAG | 1.2 (4.1) | IPMD1 | 3.5 (2.4)b | |||||||||
| ICD | 3.2 (3.3)a | ICD | 0.5 (3.3) | IPMD2 | 4.9 (3.9)b | |||||||||
| IMD | 2.2 (4.2)a | IMD | -0.4 (3) | IMD | 2.2 (4.2)a | IMD1 | 5 (3.2)b | |||||||
| BM | 0.5 (1.4) | IMD2 | 4.1 (3.7)a | |||||||||||
| Ploder et al. [26] | 2009 | 20 | NR |
Dental cast X-ray |
3 months | Region | PO - PD | NR | Region | PO - PD | NR | |||
| ICD | 3.4 (2) | ICD | 4.2 (1.8) | |||||||||||
| IPMD1 | 3.6 (1.8) | IPMD1 | 5 (2)c | |||||||||||
| IPMD2 | 3.3 (1.4) | IPMD2 | 4.7 (2)c | |||||||||||
| IMD1 | 3.2 (1.5) | IMD1 | 4.3 (1.7)c | |||||||||||
| IMD2 | 2.2 (1.8) | IMD2 | 3.6 (1.3) | |||||||||||
| Seeberger et al. [27] | 2011 | 19 | > 4 | CT-scan | 3 months | Region | PO - PD | NR | Region | PO - PD | NR | |||
| IPRD | 2.9 (1.8)d | IPD | 4.8 (1.6)d | |||||||||||
| IMRP | 2.6 (2.1)d | IMD | 4.9 (1.3)d | |||||||||||
| IMFD | 2.7 (1.2)d | |||||||||||||
aP-value < 0.05 (paired t-test), bP-value < 0.01 (paired t-test), cP-value < 0.05 (statistical test as not reported), dP-value < 0.05 (Wilcoxon signed rank test).
|
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)