Table 1. | PICOS guidelines |
|
Patient and population (P) |
Healthy patients older than 18 years with severe dental malocclusion combine with dentofacial deformities necessitating orthognathic surgery. |
| Intervention (I) | Three-dimensional virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery. |
|
Comparator or control group (C) |
Two-dimensional surgical planning of orthognathic surgery using cephalometric analysis and model surgery. |
| Outcomes (O) | Primary outcomes included surgical accuracy of hard and soft tissue. Secondary outcomes included required treatment planning time, time in the operating theatre, intraoperative blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, financial expenses, and patient-reported outcome measures. |
| Study design (S) | Randomized controlled trials. |
| Focused question | Are there any differences in the predictability and accuracy of orthognathic surgical planning using three-dimensional virtual surgical planning techniques compared with two-dimensional surgical planning? |
.png)
.png)