Table 3. | Primary and secondary implant stability |
| Study |
Follow-up (months) |
Patients | Implants | Method | Primary implant stability | P-value | Secondary implant stability | P-value | Implant system |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | N | CBCT | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||||
| Feng et al. [35] | 3 | 22 | 65 | CBCT | 73.34 (SD 7.39) | 0.006 | 80.32 (SD 4.58) | 0.351 |
Straumann® Bone Level Implant System (Straumann AG; Basel, Switzerland) |
| de Elío Oliveros [36] | Direct | 48 | 160 | CBCT | NR | 0.001 | NR | NR |
BEGO Implant (GmbH & Co. KG; Bremen, Germany) |
| Daher et al. [37] | 3 to 3.5, 12 | 18 | 120 | OPG, CBCT | 62.6 (SD 7.7) | < 0.001 | 68.6 (SD 4.2) | < 0.001 |
NobelActive® (Nobel Biocare AB; Gothenburg, Sweden) |
| Ivanova et al. [38] | 4 | 90 | 90 | CBCT | Narrow implant: 67.75 | < 0.001 | Narrow implants: 73.83 | < 0.001 |
AB Dental Implants (AB Dental Devices Ltd; Ashdod, Israel) |
| Strandard impalnt: 66.78 | |||||||||
| Standard implants: 75.25 | |||||||||
|
Wide implants: 74.93 |
|||||||||
| Wide implants: 71.21 | |||||||||
| Vallecillo et al. [39] | 2, 3 | 31 | 60 | RFA |
Native bone: 75.4 (SD 12.8) |
0.011 |
Native bone: 75.33 (SD 6.82) |
< 0.001 |
Zimmer TSV (Zimmer Biomet Dental; Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, USA) |
|
Regenerative bone: 67.17 (SD 11.47) |
Regenerative bone: 66.1 (SD 9.93) |
||||||||
| Cassetta et al. [40] | 2, 6, 12 | 142 | 268 |
Osstell™ device (Osstell AB; Gothenburg, Sweden) |
Group A (T0): 75.04 | < 0.001 |
Group A (T1): 78.53; Group B (T1): 76.14 |
0.059 |
DIO Implant (DIO Corporation; Busan, South Korea) |
|
Group A (T2): 81.66; Group B (T2): 80.1 |
|||||||||
| Group B (T0): 72.59 | |||||||||
|
Group A (T3): 80.86; Group B (T3): 80.75 |
N = number; NR = not reported; SD = standard deviation. |
.png)
.png)