Table 2. | Maxillary alveolar ridge expansion with split-crest technique compared with lateral ridge augmentation with autogenous bone block graft |
| Study |
Year of publication |
Patients | Materials and methods |
Follow-up after loading (months) |
Primary outcome measures |
Secondary outcome measures |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ARW (mm) |
Surgical procedure | Implant |
Graft/ membrane |
Implant healing | Prosthetic solution | Survival (%) | IS | PIMBL (mm) | GARW (mm) | BTC | |||||
| Prosthesis | Implant | ||||||||||||||
| Altiparmak et al. [18] | 2017 | 24 | 3 - 4 | Split-crest: 28 | 43 | Bio-Oss® + Bio-Gide® membrane | 4 months | Fixed prosthesis | 38.3 | NR | 100 | NR | NR | NR | Bad split: 3 |
| 24 | LRA autogenous bone block: 28 | 42 | 31.6 | 92.9 |
Graft exposure: 2 TRP: 7.1% |
||||||||||
ARW = alveolar ridge width; BTC = biological and technical complications; GARW = gain in alveolar ridge width; IS = implant stability; LRA = lateral ridge augmentation; NR = not reported; PIMBL = peri-implant marginal bone loss; TRP = temporary recipient paresthesia. |
.png)
.png)
.png)