Study Year of
publication 		Study
design 		Checklist Total
(% score yes) 		Methodological
quality
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q 10 Q 11
Caplanis et al. [21] 2005 Review + + + + + + + + + + + 100 High
Elian et al. [22] 2007 Review + + + + + + ? + + + + 90 High
Chu et al. [23] 2015 Review + + + + + + + + + + + 100 High
El Chaar et al. [24] 2016 Review + + + + + + + + + + + 100 High
Steigmann et al. [25] 2022 Review + + + + + + + + + + + 100 High

? = unclear; + = yes; - = no.