Table 6. | Methodological quality assessment summary of author's judgments for each included study, assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for non-randomized clinical trials |
| Study | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 |
Total (% score yes) |
Methodological quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wyrębek et al. [17] | Y | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | 66.66% | Moderate |
| Burkhardt et al. [28] | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 77.77% | High |
Methodological quality assessment summary of author's judgments for each included study, assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for non-randomized clinical trials
|
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)