Table 3. | Relationship of Haller cell, concha bullosa, paradoxical concha and bifid concha with pneumatisation |
| Haller Cell | Concha bullosa | Paradoxical concha | Bifid concha | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presence | Absence | P-valuea | Presence | Absence | P-valuea | Presence | Absence | P-valuea | Presence | Absence | P-valuea | |
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |||||
| APP | 18 (1.8) | 205 (20.5) | 0.005 | 130 (13) | 93 (9.3) | 0.01 | 46 (4.6) | 177 (17.7) | 0.074 | 1 (0.1) | 222 | 0.74 |
| PPP | 6 (0.6) | 31 (3.1) | 0.001 | 18 (1.8) | 19 (1.9) | 0.799 | 12 (1.2) | 25 (2.5) | 0.009 | 2 (0.2) | 35 | 0.000 |
| APP and PPP | 4 (0.4) | 19 (1.9) | 0.003 | 11 (1.1) | 12 (1.2) | 0.78 | 7 (0.7) | 16 (1.6) | 0.074 | 0 | 23 | 0.706 |
aStatistically significant at level P < 0.05 (Pearson Chi-square test).
|
.png)
.png)