Table 6. | Description of studies included in the review |
| Study |
Last follow-up (months) |
Population |
Patients (n) |
Sockets (n) |
Age (years) |
Gender | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test | Control | Test | Control | Total | |||||
| Harsha et al. [19] | 3 | Patients undergoing bilateral mandibular third molar extractions | 50 | 50 | 50 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Cruz et al. [20] | 3 | Patients requiring posterior tooth extractions | 26 | 13 | 13 | 43.8 |
8 males; 5 females |
6 males; 7 females |
14 males; 12 females |
| Sezavar et al. [21] | 2 | Patients who underwent tooth extractions and were planning for dental implant placement | 3 | 10 | 10 | 41 | NR | NR |
2 males; 1 female |
| Degala et al. [22] | 3 | Patients undergoing bilateral surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars | 30 | 30 | 30 | 31.5 | NR | NR |
16 males; 14 females |
| Chauhan et al. [23] | 3 | Bilateral similarly impacted mandibular third molars | 30 | 30 | 30 | 18 to 40 | NR | NR | NR |
| Saifi et al. [24] | 4 | Patients requiring all four first premolar extractions | 15 | 30 | 30 |
21.8 (SD 2.86) |
NR | NR |
6 males 9 females |
N = number; NR = not reported; SD = standard deviation. |
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)