| « Prev |
2025 Oct-Dec; Vol 16, No 4:e3 |
Next » |
|
e3 |
Temporal Vessels: An Established Recipient Site for Maxillofacial Microvascular Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reported Outcomes J Oral Maxillofac Res 2025;16(4):e3 doi:10.5037/jomr.2025.16403 Abstract | PDF |
Temporal Vessels: An Established Recipient Site for Maxillofacial Microvascular Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reported Outcomes
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund and Witten/Herdecke University, Dortmund/Witten, Germany.
2First Department of Otolaryngology, Hippokration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
3Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Hamburg - Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Corresponding Author:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Klinikum Dortmund and Witten/Herdecke University
Münsterstraße 240, 44145 Dortmund
Germany
E-mail: envitkos@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical utility of superficial temporal vessels as recipient vessels for free flap reconstruction in the maxillofacial region. Given their favourable anatomy and potential advantages in previously treated or vessel-depleted necks, we synthesised available evidence on complication rates, flap viability, and recipient site morbidity.
Material and Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed. Studies were included if they reported outcomes of free flap maxillofacial reconstructions using temporal vessels for microvascular anastomosis. Primary outcomes were arterial and venous thrombosis or compromise, and overall vascular complications. Secondary outcomes included return to theatre, flap necrosis, salvage rates, and recipient site complications. A random-effects model was used for data pooling, and heterogeneity was assessed via the I2 statistic.
Results: Twenty-one studies reporting 773 reconstructions in 759 patients were included. Arterial thrombosis/compromise occurred in 1.44%, venous in 5.13%, with an overall vascular complication rate of 7.24%. Return to theatre occurred in 7.72% and flap salvage in 4.23%. Partial and total flap necrosis rates were 2.14% and 4.05% respectively. Recipient site complications were reported in 10.43% of cases.
Conclusions: Superficial temporal vessels demonstrate reliable outcomes with complication rates comparable to cervical vessels. Their use may reduce surgical morbidity and should be considered a viable primary recipient option in complex head and neck reconstructions.
J Oral Maxillofac Res 2025;16(4):e3
doi: 10.5037/jomr.2025.16403
Accepted for publication: 30 December 2025
Keywords: maxillofacial surgery; meta-analysis; reconstructive surgical procedures; surgical flaps; temporal arteries.
|
To cite this article: Temporal Vessels: An Established Recipient Site for Maxillofacial Microvascular Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reported Outcomes J Oral Maxillofac Res 2025;16(4):e3 URL: http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2025/4/e3/v16n4e3ht.htm |
Received: 4 December 2025 | Accepted: 30 December 2025 | Published: 31 December 2025
Copyright: © The Author(s). Published by JOMR under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence, 2025.






