Table 1. | PICO guidelines |
| Population (P) | Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with conical abutment platform-switched implants |
| Intervention (I) | One-abutment-one-time protocol, where the definitive abutment is connected at implant placement and not subsequently removed |
| Comparison (C) | Repeated abutment disconnections, in which healing or provisional abutments are removed and reconnected one or more times during the prosthetic phase |
| Outcomes (O) |
Primary outcomes: marginal bone loss.
Secondary outcomes: probing depth, survival rate, biological complications, and prosthetic complications. |
| Focus question | In adult patients with conical abutment platform-switched implants, does the one-abutment-one-time protocol, compared with repeated abutment disconnections, result in reduced marginal bone loss (primary outcome), and more favourable probing depth, implant survival, and biological and prosthetic complication rates (secondary outcomes)? |
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)