« Prev |
2016 Jul-Sep; Vol 7, No 3:e11 |
Next » |
e11 |
The 1st Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2016. Summary and Consensus Statements: Group II - Peri-Implantitis Diagnostics and Decision Tree J Oral Maxillofac Res 2016;7(3):e11 doi:10.5037/jomr.2016.7311 |
The 1st Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2016. Summary and Consensus Statements: Group II - Peri-Implantitis Diagnostics and Decision Tree
1Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
2Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
3Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain.
4Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
5Department of Pathology and Biopathology and Medicine Regenerative Institute (IBIMER, CIBM), University of Granada, Spain.
6Clinic of Dental and Oral Pathology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Group Leader:
Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry
University of Illinois at Chicago
801 S Paulina Street, Room 469G, Chicago, IL 60612
USA
Phone: +1-312-996-0265
E-mail: ttozum@uic.edu
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The task of Group 2 was to review and update the existing data concerning clinical and genetic methods of diagnostics of peri-implantitis. Special interest was paid to the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) overview including analysis of enzymes and biomarkers and microbial profiles from implants.
Material and Methods: The main areas of interest were as follows: effect of smoking and history of periodontitis, prosthetic treatment mistakes, excess cement, overloading, general diseases influence on peri-implantitis development. The systematic review and/or meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO, an international prospective register of systematic reviews: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/. The literature in the corresponding areas of interest was searched and reported using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) Statement: http://www.prisma-statement.org/. The method of preparation of systematic reviews of the literature based on comprehensive search strategies was discussed and standardized. The summary of the materials and methods employed by the authors in preparing the systematic review and/or meta-analysis is presented in Preface chapter.
Results: The results and conclusions of the review process are presented in the respective papers. The group′s general commentaries, consensus statements, clinical recommendations and implications for research are presented in this article.
J Oral Maxillofac Res 2016;7(3):e11
doi: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7311
Accepted for publication: 8 September 2016
To cite this article: The 1st Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2016.Summary and Consensus Statements: Group II - Peri-Implantitis Diagnostics and Decision Tree J Oral Maxillofac Res 2016;7(3):e11 URL: http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2016/3/e11/v7n3e11ht.htm |
Received: 25 August 2016 | Accepted: 7 September 2016 | Published: 9 September 2016
Copyright: © The Author(s). Published by JOMR under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence, 2016.