« Prev |
2024 Jul-Sep; Vol 15, No 3:e5 |
Next » |
e5 |
Risk of Narrow Upper Airway in Class II Children with Large Horizontal Maxillary Overjet Assessed By Acoustic Reflection: a Case-Control Study J Oral Maxillofac Res 2024;15(3):e5 doi:10.5037/jomr.2024.15305 Abstract | HTML | PDF |
Risk of Narrow Upper Airway in Class II Children with Large Horizontal Maxillary Overjet Assessed By Acoustic Reflection: a Case-Control Study
1Section of Orthodontics and Dental Sleep Clinic, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2Section of Clinical Oral Physiology, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Corresponding Author:
20 Noerre Allé, DK-2200 Copenhagen N
Denmark
Phone: 0045 35326670
E-mail: alson@sund.ku.dk
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this case-control study was to examine upper airway by acoustic reflection in class II children with large horizontal maxillary overjet compared to children with neutral occlusion.
Material and Methods: The study group included children of 9 to 14 years with class II and large horizontal maxillary overjet (≥ 6 mm) compared to children with neutral occlusion (controls). Acoustic pharyngometry and rhinometry were performed in natural head position. Differences between groups were tested by chi-square test, general linear model (adjusted for age, gender and body mass index [BMI]), and Mann-Whitney test.
Results: The study and control group consisted of 37 (boys: 19, girls: 18) and 32 (boys: 16, girls: 16) participants, respectively. No significant differences in age, gender, and BMI were found between the groups. For the acoustic rhinometry measurements significantly increased resistance (P = 0.04), reduced volume (P = 0.03) and distance to minimal cross-section area (MCA) (P = 0.035) were found in the study group, but only for the right nostril. However, significantly reduced MCA for both nostrils was found in the study group (P = 0.025 to 0.04). No significant differences in acoustic pharyngometry measurements were found.
Conclusions: Nasal airway dimensions were significantly reduced, and nasal resistance was significantly increased in the study group compared to controls. Thus, class II and large overjet with indication for growth adaptive treatment may be a risk factor for sleep-disordered breathing. In the future, orthodontic paediatric patients may benefit from non-invasive risk assessment of narrow upper airway using acoustic reflection.
J Oral Maxillofac Res 2024;15(3):e5
doi: 10.5037/jomr.2024.15305
Accepted for publication: 29 September 2024
Keywords: acoustic rhinometry; acoustics; airway resistance; angle class II; child; malocclusion.
To cite this article: Risk of Narrow Upper Airway in Class II Children with Large Horizontal Maxillary Overjet Assessed By Acoustic Reflection: a Case-Control Study J Oral Maxillofac Res 2024;15(3):e5 URL: http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2024/3/e5/v15n3e5ht.htm |
Received: 6 August 2024 | Accepted: 29 September 2024 | Published: 30 September 2024
Copyright: © The Author(s). Published by JOMR under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence, 2024.