Table 3. | Transcrestal maxillary sinus membrane elevation using osseodensification (TSMEOD) compared with osteotome-mediated sinus floor augmentation |
| Study | Year | Material and methods | Clinical outcome | Radiographic outcome | PROM | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical method | NOP |
ARH (mm) |
Grafting material | NOI |
DOS (minutes) |
Follow-up (months) |
Implant survival (%) |
ISQ |
PIMBL (mm) |
Complications |
Endo-sinus bone gain (mm) |
Bone density changes (HU) |
|||||
| Implant placement | 6 months | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 months | Implant placement | 6 months | |||||||||||||||
| Hashem et al. [20] | 2023 | TSMEOD | 7 | 4.7 | Xenograft Tutobone® | 7 | NR | 6 | 100 | 74.2 (SD 3.9) | 87.1 (SD 3.3)a | 0.2 | None | 5.8 (SD 0.5) | 266.4 | 660.3 | NR |
| OMSFE | 7 | 4.8 | 7 | 100 | 68.5 (SD 2.2) | 80.2 (SD 1.6) | 0.4 | BPPV: 1 | 6.9 (SD 0.5)a | 248.8 | 530.4 | ||||||
| EL-Ghobashy et al. [21] | 2022 | TSMEOD | 5 | 5 - 8 | None | 6 | 7.3 (SD 2.2)b | 6 | 100 | 66.2 (SD 9.6)c | 77 (SD 3.5)d | NR | Edema (0 - 4) | NR | NR | Pain (0 - 10) | |
| 1.3 (SD 0.5) | 3 (SD 2.3) | ||||||||||||||||
| OMSFE | 6 | 6 | 14.5 (SD 2.5) | 100 | 54.8 (SD 7.2) | 65.2 (SD 3.1) | 2.2 (SD 1) | 4.2 (SD 2.3) | |||||||||
| Rostom and Eiid [22] | 2021 | TSMEOD | 5 | 8.1 (SD 1.5) | None | 5 | NR | 6 | NR | NR | NR |
Headache/ vertigo: 0g; swelling: 2 |
1.8 (SD 0.4) | NR | NR | ||
| OMSFE | 5 | 6.9 (SD 0.5) | 5 |
Headache/ vertigo: 5; swelling: 4 |
1.4 (SD 0.5) | ||||||||||||
| Arafat et al. [23] | 2019 | TSMEOD | 12 | 7.1 (SD 0.5) | None | 12 | NR | 12 | 100 | 65.2 (SD 4.4)e | 75.9 (SD 2.9)e | 0.9 (SD 0.2) | None | 3.3 (SD 0.3)f | NR | NR | |
| OMSFE | 12 | 7.4 (SD 0.5) | 12 | 100 | 52.8 (SD 6.3) | 67.8 (SD 4.8) | 1 (SD 0.2) | 2.8 (SD 0.3) | |||||||||
aP < 0.001; bP = 0.002; cP = 0.043; dP < 0.0001; eP ≤ 0.001; fP = 0.001 (paired t-test). gP = 0.002 (chi-square test).
|
.png)
.png)
.png)