Table 4. | Transcrestal maxillary sinus membrane elevation using osseodensification (TSMEOD) compared with maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) applying the lateral window technique |
| Study | Year | Material and methods | Clinical outcome | Radiographic outcome | PROM | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Surgical method |
NOP |
ARH (mm) |
Grafting material |
NOI |
DOS (minutes) |
Follow-up (months) |
Implant survival (%) |
ISQ | Complications |
Endo-sinus bone gain (mm) |
Bone density changes (HU) |
|||||
| Implant placement | 6 months | 6 months | Implant placement | 6 months | ||||||||||||
| Elsaid et al. [24] | 2024 | TSMEOD | 7 | 5.6 (SD 0.3) | Alloplastic bone substitute (Nanobone®) |
7 | 30.9 (SD 4.1)c | 6 | 100 | 61.4 (SD 2) | 80 (SD 3.1) | NR | 5.3 (SD 0.8) | 457.3 (SD 69.9) | 818.4 (SD 109.6) | NR |
| MSFA | 7 | 5.2 (SD 0.5) | 7 | 83 (SD 12) | 100 | 56.9 (SD 2.9) | 75.9 (SD 2.9) | 10 (SD 1.8)c | 505.9 (SD 50.4) | 827.1 (SD 109.7) | ||||||
| Gaspar et al. [25] | 2024 | TSMEOD | 10 | 2.9 (SD 0.5) | Alloplastic bone substitute (NovaBone®) | 10 | 32.9 (SD 5.3)a | 12 | 100 | 65.5 (SD 11.1) | 74.4 (SD 4)a |
SMR: 1a; days edema: 0.5a; epistaxis: 0a |
NR | NR |
Days using analgesics |
|
| 2 (SD 1)a | ||||||||||||||||
| MSFA | 10 | 2.4 (SD 0.7) | 10 | 71.1 (SD 10.4) | 100 | 61.5 (SD 10.9) | 69.8 (SD 5.1) |
SMR: 4; days edema: 7; epistaxis: 4 |
7.5 (SD 6.5) | |||||||
aP < 0.001; bP = 0.046 (Mann-Whitney test). cP < 0.05 (unpaired t-test).
|
.png)
.png)
.png)