Table 3. | Comparison of quantitative giant cell data between aggressive and non-aggressive CGCG |
| Factors | CGCG | P-valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-aggressive | Aggressive | ||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| Giant cells in 25 HPF | 67.75 (26.76) | 80.5 (30.4) | 0.549 |
| Nuclei in giant cells in 25 HPF | 514.41 (290.71) | 482 (197.98) | 0.884 |
| Nuclei/giant cell | 7.27 (1.75) | 5.94 (0.21) | 0.322 |
| Area of giant cell | 985.49 (228.6) | 930.81 (105.14) | 0.751 |
| Percentage FSA occupied by giant cells | 3.1 (1.01) | 3.63 (1.74) | 0.543 |
| Relative size index | 4.85 (1.4) | 4.41 (0.49) | 0.68 |
| Arrangement of nuclei in giant cells | 142.98 (47.07) | 156.29 (12.07) | 0.707 |
aStatistically significant at the level P < 0.05 (Student's t-test).
|
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)